Quote Originally Posted by cosmo99 View Post
You may not have said that very thing but you are always great at implying things and then using a comment like the one above when someone calls you out on it. I could post a million things disputing what you post but you would just dispute those also. I used to be a lot like you, get cocky on the fact that I THOUGHT that I was always right, knew everything, so well rounded, up to date on all the politics and such, that goes away when you find out that a great deal of people know a lot more than you ever thought you did. Those same people bring you down a notch or two. You may not have met them yet but sometime in your life you will.
If that's how you want to take it, that i'm implying something, even when I clear it up of whatever comment that was claimed that I said this or that..then it's not my problem then. If I were that wrong, that far off or flat wrong period, it'd be easy to post something to do that, but that doesn't happen and that same excuse is used "well if i did post it, you'd just deny it". I'm not always right, I don't know everything, never claim to be anything close to that and know that there are countless people that know more than I do about things...yet that's cocky? LMAO. I'm knowledgeable on certain things, I usually stick to those topics and check my facts before I do...some of you take that as being a "know it all", I really don't care. As I've said, facts shut anyone up, yet it's the same tired line of "you act like a know it all, no one can argue with you" is played over and over again when you can't prove me wrong on a particular subject.

When I say "prove me wrong" or to "post proof/facts", that's not being cocky, that's knowing I've looked it up/knew something about it beforehand/ read a bit on it and then knowing I'm right on THAT PARTICULAR SUBJECT...not some universal knowledge that I know everything. I'm difficult to debate with because I hardly go spouting off on something and know how to debate(i.e. looking at sources, checking facts within the source and then the whole argument all together). Not that I think I'm always right, when it's not putting myself into situations where I would be wrong.